🔗 Share this article

The Evolution of a Phenomenon tends to be characterized by specific steps.

1. The Grand Vision

A charismatic leader or leaders present an innovative concept pledging a cure for struggling players.

So here we are. Plans are in motion to confront the system in Australia. The gunships are circling. Conflict emerges from the sidelines. A lone figure, naked, nervous, the phrase ATTACKING MINDSET displayed prominently in chicken blood, has emerged into view and is being led away with discretion to a different team at Derbyshire.

Remember the early days, when optimism reigned? The initial phase, of uninhibited aggression.

2. Love-Bombing

Cult leaders promise a reboot, optimism ahead, support, redemption together united in belief in the philosophy.

How did it feel back then? Players celebrating feeling good. Body art. Muscles. Focus. Peak performance vibes. Oh sure, England’s players will claim it’s not a real term, which is funny because if it doesn’t exist, what was that spectacle?

Yet it’s clear what it is. It’s the batsman attempting a move so outrageous it’s beyond belief. It’s the adrenaline of the leader in his final form, a look that says: pensive Nordic god, rugged appearance, hair woven from beaver hide, truly contemporary you half-expect to notice and see him playing at mid-off stripped to the waist embracing nature.

It’s the opener still being allowed addressing the media, out there looking like a happy little woodland creature formally attired, saying stuff like we’re challenging norms. Indeed, the atmosphere, initially, was entirely positive.

3. Expansion Period

Growth phase. Togetherness strengthened via memorization of the cult’s slogans. These beliefs are often illogical to prove commitment.

Does anyone else feel? The backlash, the anger, the disappointment following the initial loss feels overblown, overdone. The performance was poor on the field, as they often do in Australia. They were savaged defensively in a short span as the bowling and captaincy fell apart, carved around by the batsman playing aggressively but smarter, responsive to the situation, an athlete shining with aura.

And now we have this the pile-on, the anger, the view of the sport as a kind of abomination. The feeling seems to be that England don’t just need to lose, they should be dismantled, to be scoured, flame-throwered, overwhelmed via traditional methods of Mitchell Starc’s movements, the simple basics of the veteran, out there celebrating his wickets with a bashful smile similar to getting a nice new fishing rod. What impact will this have?

4. External Conflict

Problems arise from failures in the plan. But the cult cannot admit errors. It begins to thrive on anger towards critics.

In truth, approaching the next match, we have now reached an intriguing moment in the story of this movement. They might succeed in Brisbane through aggressive play. Probably, defeat could come swiftly. And if they do lose it feels like we could be witnessing the decline.

Ahead of this, a couple of points to note on the topic. In the past, during the initial excitement, of light and heat, a column appeared labeling it a movement. There was outrage, which demonstrated since it’s clear the best way of proving something definitely isn’t a cult is when its acolytes react defensively denying scrutiny of the beliefs.

Recent events lately are equally notable. Criticism of the approach is now the trend. Social media is furious, disappointed commentators, shots of angry middle-aged followers overseas disappointed by the short match, similar to people wanting fairness.

Conversely, we have the wider backdrop of the opponent’s mixed ingrained annoyance with the aggressive tourists, stating, the methods you value and have fostered and nurtured as part of your identity from the opposition, well, it’s all a bit of a gag ultimately.

And this is the real point. It’s all cults. The approach was a phenomenon because cricket is a cult. Or rather, the team has long been exclusive, a circle, a private event, a closed world with centuries of tradition and mystery defining it. Historically, this was where entry is limited. It’s the colonial game of the nation, the pioneering brand. And guess what, the nation has its own culture, a system of unknown levels, a place that literally still has a king.

England’s cricketers have been enclosed in this environment since childhood. Seeking change, to build a better atmosphere, they are just repeating their own experience, creating another a bubble, an exclusive group, but doing it this time with a new team and a mentor who wants you to be yourself as long as yourself is quite a lot like myself.

Live where your feet are. Confront risks. However much you change, you remain stuck.

Reflecting on this, it is perhaps the moment to have some sympathy for the approach, to appreciate its good points, of which there are many. What does it represent? Encouraging expression. Defying norms. Batting aggressively|Attacking with